<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Succinct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharpsand.net/2009/01/29/succinct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharpsand.net/2009/01/29/succinct/</link>
	<description>Joseph Duemer&#039;s blog about reading, writing, politics, birds, food, &#38; weather</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpsand.net/2009/01/29/succinct/comment-page-1/#comment-8745</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharpsand.net/?p=1113#comment-8745</guid>
		<description>Yeah, though I don&#039;t think the Repub. opposition is even that coherent -- it&#039;s just an amalgam of spite &amp; (failed) ideology &amp; (staggering) economic ignorance. Actually, I&#039;m a little optimistic, for two reasons: 1) I think it&#039;s a pretty good bill, though not perfect; 2) the economy runs as much on psychology as markets &amp; Obama seems to have people feeling like we&#039;ve got a chance to get out of this collapse without a total meltdown. The Republicans have to work for a meltdown, for political reasons. But that is the path to taking the country down completely &amp; how that helps them I can&#039;t really see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, though I don&#8217;t think the Repub. opposition is even that coherent &#8212; it&#8217;s just an amalgam of spite &#038; (failed) ideology &#038; (staggering) economic ignorance. Actually, I&#8217;m a little optimistic, for two reasons: 1) I think it&#8217;s a pretty good bill, though not perfect; 2) the economy runs as much on psychology as markets &#038; Obama seems to have people feeling like we&#8217;ve got a chance to get out of this collapse without a total meltdown. The Republicans have to work for a meltdown, for political reasons. But that is the path to taking the country down completely &#038; how that helps them I can&#8217;t really see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpsand.net/2009/01/29/succinct/comment-page-1/#comment-8744</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharpsand.net/?p=1113#comment-8744</guid>
		<description>Joe-

The political cynicism of the Republicans in a time of national crisis is astounding. Their opposition to the bill is pure politics. 

They want the Dems to &quot;own&quot; the bill so that, if the country is not out of this severe recession in 2010 they can run a see-I-told-you-so campaign even though they have offered NO alternative. 

The &quot;opposition&quot; has also been utterly incoherent: it increases the deficit too much, but doesn&#039;t spend enough money on tax cuts (which somehow don&#039;t add to the deficit); Obama embraces failed-Keynsian economics, yet supply-side economics is code for screw the poor and middle class; there&#039;s not enough immediate stimulus, even though the Repubs have been blocking stimulus efforts since at least September.

How many shovels could already be in the ground?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe-</p>
<p>The political cynicism of the Republicans in a time of national crisis is astounding. Their opposition to the bill is pure politics. </p>
<p>They want the Dems to &#8220;own&#8221; the bill so that, if the country is not out of this severe recession in 2010 they can run a see-I-told-you-so campaign even though they have offered NO alternative. </p>
<p>The &#8220;opposition&#8221; has also been utterly incoherent: it increases the deficit too much, but doesn&#8217;t spend enough money on tax cuts (which somehow don&#8217;t add to the deficit); Obama embraces failed-Keynsian economics, yet supply-side economics is code for screw the poor and middle class; there&#8217;s not enough immediate stimulus, even though the Repubs have been blocking stimulus efforts since at least September.</p>
<p>How many shovels could already be in the ground?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

