



. . . it’s obviously time to get the hell out.
Reading over my recent entries — indeed, this would be true going back to my first blog entry nearly seven years ago — it’s clear that my interests are not so much intellectual as sensual. My weblog is a graph of my engagements. Friday, October 5th, 2001:
Dewey begins Experience & Nature with the observation that nature gives rise, through evolution, to human experience, but that experience then encompasses all of nature. With this single empirical move, Dewey brushes aside the old subject/object, man/nature & mind/body dulaisms of 2500 years of Western philosophy. Wittgenstein begins his career with the idea that philosophy is in need of a kind of “reeducation” that eliminates certain kinds of problems as illusions born of abstraction; Dewey follows this method boldly, all right, but it makes me a little uneasy.
On our morning dog walks Carole & I walk along the river, past out neighbor Betty’s house. Betty feed the Canada Geese every morning & there is often a big flock of them around. A few weeks ago we noticed that one big male was dragging a broken wing. He has been making a living all right in the summer, but now the geese are gathering to fly to their southern range, he is soon going to be in trouble. I called Betty this morning to tell her about a bird rehabilitator I’d found through the county SPCA. Turns out Betty had found the same woman. The goose with the broken wing is unlikely to every fly again, but will be cared for. One touching detail: the injured bird’s mate sticks close by him, even when all the other geese have flown off. It’s easy to sentimentalize animals, of course, but I find this animal loyalty moving. Betty & I agreed we’d take the bird person’s advice as to whether the mate should be captured too. I suspect it will be best to take the injured bird & encourage the mate to rejoin the flock. Not as satisfying as a human story, but probably a better story for the goose.
This is sad. The Chronicle didn’t ask me, but reading through the post & comments at Cosmic Variance, I couldn’t think of a single guilty pleasure. I used to have some, but they have faded away over time. I don’t know, maybe Partick O’Brian novels. Guilty pleasures are those things you do that seem to need to be explained, given one’s usual identity, role, etc. And I do find myself explaining O’Brian’s attraction fairly often.