Support Rep. Jay Inslee’s Resolution of Inquiry

Seattle Congressman Jay Inslee is preparing a resolution of inquiry against the Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, the first step in an impeachment proceeding. Mark Kleiman suggests that a flood of small donations might send a message of support to the congressman & more importantly to his peers in the House. I just gave him fifty dollars. Progressives should support politicians who have the courage to do the right thing.

Standing Armies

Like the Founders, I am opposed to standing armies. In Federalist 26, Hamilton lays out the history & the political theory. Standing armies are threats to democracy & morality. The modern American volunteer army is the contemporary version of a standing army. And the political right — a category that includes a large number of politicians with a D after thier names — takes it as given that an even bigger milatery is required for American “security.” The opposite is true. The US would be far better served by a small professional army & a draft in wartime. Here is what we have now, instead of a draft.

The infection is very deep. In my recent run-in with the frothing Right, three themes emerged in my comment threads & those at the Chronicle & Free Republic:

  1. If I didn’t appreciate my American freedoms, I should go live in North Korea, or wherever. This is just the old Vietnam-era America Love it of Leave it line dressed up for the new century. Militarists have to assume those critical of the military & of the use of the military are not “real Americans” or that we “hate America.” This cultural positioning has itself become a cliché that is almost impossible to think oneself out of.
  2. The idea that the military does not defend Constitutional freedoms, but grants them: It was taken as given that, at least, I was ungrateful for “the freedoms I had been granted” by “those [I] hate and demean.” I also fail, apparently, to recognize “. . . the simple truth that freedom is always tethered to a soldier’s gun,” another wrote. The semi-literate clichés of those posting at the Free Republic site are symptomatic of a deeper atavism in American culture, but it is, we might say, an ascendant atavism. Many people who responded to my provocation did so by fantasizing situations in which they or someone else would beat me up. One posted the Mapquest directions from my house to the entrance of Fort Drum, the local army base. Another imagined me revealing my views in a bar outside Fort Bragg.
  3. The mockery of poetry. This might be simple anti-intellectualism, which has a long history in American politics. One writer went to the trouble to look up the titles of some of my poems, then posted them with the comment “’nuff said.” I have to admit, when I first read this, I was mystified. But when someone else posted my picture & called me a “pussy,” I wasn’t surprised. The point is, these people are representative. Their voices constitute the low rumble behind the network news.

The “volunteer army” & the National Guard as career paths for the working class are the most dangerous legacies of the American defeat in Vietnam. Alexander Hamilton, no friend of popular democracy, understood the dangers of standing armies; the nation is now imperiled because we have forgotten his warning.

Poetry’s Obligation

Poetry has an obligation to oppose clichés. Clichés are the viral carriers of lies. Poetry can do this by rejecting cliché or by analyzing or exploding cliché in its own use of language. The poet — who certainly does not need to be a maker of verses — uses one kind of language against another, verbal jujitsu. Making verses(broadly defined) is a discipline that can be employed against clich&eacutes; Poetry shares this obligation with other disciplines, but is particularly suited to the work. Poetry ought to make it harder to lie.

I’m a User Not a Dealer . . .

. . . of Rich web applications, that is. Before I forget, I want to make note of this interesting essay by Uday Gajendar. I found the piece via a link from my colleague Johndan Johnson-Eilola’s blog Work / Space.) And having just completed teaching my first online course, I have some strong opinions about the rhetorical situation of web applications. I’ll write more about that soon — I’m gearing up for fall classes & thinking about how to use web technology — but for the moment just wanted to recommend this as a smart & intellectually well-grounded approach to the problems associated with online communication. I will be making use of the ideas in Gajendar’s essay as I put together class blogs, wikis, online gradebooks & so on.