Pretty sure I saw a yellow-bellied sapsucker this afternoon back in the woods by the river. It might have been a young flicker, though. I’ve never seen a sapsucker around here & flickers are common. Our solitary wild turkey was back again, cleaning up under the feeder. I wonder if it’s a female with a nest nearby? [More wild turkey information here.]
Monthly Archives: April 2007
Spicer Versus Berryman
Why does Jack Spicer get included in the post-avant canon, but not John Berryman? Both are metrical masters who dramatize the self in extremis. The inclusion / exclusion is political & cultural, not literary. The notion of the post-avant is just another version of a discredited identity politics.
Of course: I realize that Berryman worked from the academic side of the Beat / Academic divide of 1950s American poetry, while Spicer worked the anti-academic side of the fence. Even as an undergraduate in 1969, though, I was reading from both streams. That is, I never quite got the distinctions that my elders were so obsessed with during the Anthology Wars.
Last Class of the Semester
Lots of grading to do in the next few days, but classes are over. It was in some ways a tough semester — I missed a week early on because of illness & the particular combination of large writing-intensive classes meant I had too much student writing to respond to — but overall it was a satisfying term. I was teaching one brand new class, The Literature of American Popular Music, & two large sections of another class, Introduction to Literature, that I hadn’t taught in ten years. So both were essentially new. Which means that I was disorganized. What made the semester successful was my students. I am, even in classes I have taught many times, an improviser. My method is to know the material well, but to walk into the class each day the way a jazz musician takes the stand — ready to see what happens. I realize this may sound a bit precious, but it’s true. I may have a chart, either in my head or on a scrap of paper, with the main things I want to cover, and there is of course a text that’s been assigned & listed on the syllabus & class blog, but after that I pretty much wing it. Now, there are things my students need to know & I try to slip that information in sideways, but the main thing I want to do is engage my students in a human process. I want to be a storyteller around an ancient fire. I want to be Bird on the stand, but that’s a level of genius that remains a far horizon of inspiration.
Given the nature of contemporary American higher education, I often feel guilty about my failure to be “rigorous.” Still, on the evidence of my last class meetings this week, students were mostly satisfied. I usually spend the last day of class talking about what I think went well & what I think was less successful. I spend some time critiquing my organization & management of the class, then ask for suggestions & responses. When I get home, I jot down notes & stick them in a folder so I can incorporate good ideas next time I teach the class. My final question to the class is: What are you going to take away from this class when you walk out the door today? I want students to reflect on what they have been doing, which, in the modern American university is highly routinized under the pressure of bureaucratic necessity. (All along, I try to subtly get students to ask the meta-questions, but on the last day I make it explicit.) I can’t of course escape the requirements of the institution. What I can do & what I try to do is offer students a way of understanding their education in a broader & less instrumental way than they might otherwise understand it. That all sounds very grand, but in practice it just means digging into texts, then stepping back to consider their value & the values they embody, along with they way that values get embodied.
So, anyway, on the second to the last day of class in my Literature of American Popular Music course — the last class with real “content” — I’d assigned Frank O’Hara’s poem “The Day Lady Died” & Jack Spicer’s “Song for Bird and Myself” & the discussion of the O’Hara went well & the students could see what he was doing. I had told them when I handed out the copy of the poem during the previous class that they had to look up any words / references /allusions they didn’t understand & that helped drive the discussion. Then I turned to the Spicer poem, reading it aloud. (One of the great privileges of being a Professor of Literature is that I get to read poems aloud to a captive audience.) And as I was reading it, I was thinking, “this is the greatest fucking poem I’ve ever read” & “this catches Parker’s method exactly.” What mastery / undercutting of the Modernist poetic line. Obviously, I’d read the poem before, but I’d never read it out loud to an audience. I was also thinking, as I was reading, that the method was the method I have evolved for teaching. You can think about a lot while reading a poem to a class full of students. But here is the best thing: my students dug into that Spicer poem like a bunch of fully enlightened angel-headed beatniks. We’d listened to a bit of Bird & watched Eastwood’s movie, but this poem got through to the engineering & business majors as well as the hipsters in the class. Improvisation.
Fraud
It’s very touching that her colleagues & the students she worked with are saddened by the sudden resignation of Marilee Jones, the dean of Admissions at MIT & I suppose it means I’m a crass bastard who fails to see the larger tragedy, but the first thing I thought of when I read this was Ms. Jones’ TIAA-Cref retirement account. Most universities make a substantial contribution to the retirement accounts of their professional staff, so will MIT ask Jones to pay back 28 years’ worth of its contributions? After all, they were made on the basis of a fraudulent contract. And what about the investment profits? Aren’t profits earned through fraudulent contracts subject to some sort of seizure? I suspect this is not a criminal matter, but what is the civil law? I honestly don’t know. On the broader philosophical level & speaking as someone who believes in redemption & forgiveness (I can’t help it, I was raised Christian), I’m not feeling much sympathy for Jones. She didn’t need the fake credentials to get her first job at MIT, for one thing. As she moved up the career ladder, however, those fake credentials did, no doubt, become part of her “qualifications” for jobs that did require certain academic benchmarks. Yet she continued to use the faked degrees. In an academic community, for better or worse, such things matter. I don’t think Ms. Jones should be ruined & I admit I can’t decide who has been harmed; furthermore, I admit it is probably overly idealistic to believe in fairy tales like the fiction of the Academic Community, but this fraud leaves a very bitter taste on the tongue.
David Halberstam
The journalist David Halberstam died last night from injuries sustained in an automobile accident. He was 73. Halberstam, along with Neil Sheehan & a couple of others, reinvented American journalism under the historical pressure of the American War in Vietnam. What a terrible end to an astonishing career. Halberstam’s The Best and the Brightest & Sheehan’s A Bright, Shining Lie defined a new approach to writing contemporary history. Between them, they nail down a decade that revolutionized the ways in which Americans conceive of themselves. Vietnam “changed everything” in a way that September 11 certainly did not. In fact, those who claim that 9/11 “changed everything” seem to imagine — in a breathtaking act of wishful thinking — that the terrorist attack restored the United States to some sort of pre-Vietnam state of virtue.
Update: Speaking of Vietnam, see Todd Gitlin’s note on Halberstam’s connection of the Vietnam folly to the Iraq folly.